Published: March 13th 2008 - at 8:59 am

Globalisation and the Welfare State


by Gracchi    

Most people on the British left are free traders or fair traders- we do not oppose globalisation and do not expect it to make real differences to the way that government policy in the UK works. That might seem counter intuitive. Afterall competitive pressures you might assume will lead to arguments for diminishing the welfare state to become more powerful over time. Essentially the welfare state often supplies through its payments a floor to the kind of wages and conditions that companies can offer, and as cheaper labour comes to the market, you would expect governments to adjust welfare provisions downwards both to enhance competition and to lower tax rates. Well that’s not actually true.

A study by a set of German academics (A. Dreher, J. Sturm and H.W. Ursprung) for the journal Public Choice (pdf*) finds that globalisation has made very little difference to the composition of public spending. They suggest that we might have over-estimated globalisation as a phenomenon and that some of its effects may be blurred.

However they also argue that this lack of consequences stemming from globalisation for public expenditure, arises because there is a compensatory effect- that politicians are rewarded for compensating their constituents who fall out of work and who might fall out of work. The fear of the consequences of globalisation mitigates those consequences in a paradoxical way. Its an interesting finding- it doesn’t alter the way that the economics of globalisation- but it does remind us that that does not determine what we do about globalisation.

The point is that economics does not always lead politics, especially in a democracy. Democratic power, manifested in the ballot box, creates incentives to mitigate the consequences of loss and I would argue that demonstrates not merely the justice of democratic systems but also their stability.

It is because of a democratic system, that some measure of equality is preserved despite the inegalitarian consequences of competition. In this sense the argument about globalisation is part of a larger argument about the way that democracy goes hand in hand with a just and stabalising social policy. It would be interesting to see whether that’s true and whether the spending policies of dictatorships and democracies say in Latin America are very different and also to see what impact compulsary voting has upon the way that governments spend money.

Overall though, because this is a dual study of policy in the OECD and in a larger collection of countries, I think its possible to say that the responsiveness of politicians to electorates has led to different policies being created. The fact that most current governments see their legitimacy as rising from the people, not descending from some other authority, leads them to a situation in which they are constrained in their actions.

Ultimately when it comes to globalisation, the constraints to appealing to public legitimacy seem to cancel out the constraint of global market pressure.

*The article is only free for a while, so it may become unavailable at some point in the future.


---------------------------
    Share on Tumblr  


About the author
'Gracchi' is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He started a blog last year which deals with culture and politics and history, where his interest lies. He is fascinated by all sorts of things including good films and books and undogmatic discussion of ideas. This seems like a good place to do the latter... Also at: Westminister Wisdom
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: Blog


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


1. Margin4 Error

The report makes an interesting read, and I certainly agree that globalisation is not something to fear and oppose.

However – it doesn’t explore the alternatives to its democratic explanation of stability.

While it is plausible that welfare has been maintained because of democratic strength – it is just as plausible that like New Labour, many governments have drawn the conclusion that welfare is an economic asset.

cutting provision for those most in need might mean cutting taxes, but that may not be as useful a trade advantage as a better educated and more active population, which can be better achieved through welfare provision.

It would be interesting to see that explored too, as that would suggest globalisation is a great asset for the left.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs




Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
LATEST COMMENT PIECES
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
» Incidents like this shame us all
» Taxpayers Alliance want to cut taxes, mostly for the rich
» We’re turning The Spirit Level into a film: help us in that goal
» I love the counter-productive attitude of right-wing commentators
» Watch out for the TPA’s report arguing for more cuts tomorrow
» The resurgence of bigoted conservatism in Ireland
» What’s the point of being ‘British’?
» The tragedy behind the Sam Hallam case
» Will JP Morgan be able to walk away from billion dollar losses?
» Labour is now even more reliant on left-wing voters






14 Comments



13 Comments



57 Comments



41 Comments



19 Comments



13 Comments



30 Comments



116 Comments



25 Comments



33 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» So Much For Subtlety posted on Incidents like this shame us all

» Jim posted on Incidents like this shame us all

» Sunny Hundal posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think

» Shatterface posted on Incidents like this shame us all

» Trooper Thompson posted on Frank Field wrong on workless households

» Shatterface posted on Incidents like this shame us all

» So Much For Subtlety posted on Funny bits of TPA report you probably missed

» Shatterface posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think

» So Much For Subtlety posted on Frank Field wrong on workless households

» Incidents like this shame us all | Black Triangle Campaign posted on Incidents like this shame us all

» Barney posted on Funny bits of TPA report you probably missed

» So Much For Subtlety posted on Incidents like this shame us all

» P Ve M posted on Public DOES want gay marriage, Lords reform

» So Much For Subtlety posted on Incidents like this shame us all

» So Much For Subtlety posted on TPA report quotes Bible to preach low taxation