<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can the Democrats win on numbers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/29/can-the-democrats-win-on-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/29/can-the-democrats-win-on-numbers/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 02:58:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ad</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/29/can-the-democrats-win-on-numbers/#comment-6091</link>
		<dc:creator>ad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/29/can-the-democrats-win-on-numbers/#comment-6091</guid>
		<description>So as long as more Democrats vote than Republicans they should be able to win?

I&#039;d guessed that myself...

I cannot help but think of all those predictions from less than a year ago saying that Clinton was certain to be the Democratic nominee. And that McCain was finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as long as more Democrats vote than Republicans they should be able to win?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d guessed that myself&#8230;</p>
<p>I cannot help but think of all those predictions from less than a year ago saying that Clinton was certain to be the Democratic nominee. And that McCain was finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Griffin</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/29/can-the-democrats-win-on-numbers/#comment-6039</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/29/can-the-democrats-win-on-numbers/#comment-6039</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I would take the latter half with a pinch of salt. Statistically McCain is less popular than Obama (who is on an upward trend in almost every poll) where it matters, the swing states. He is &quot;competitive&quot; in Ohio to the tune of being within or just around the margin of error. What&#039;s important to remember here is the context. Ohio is a republican state after 2004, though obviously marginally. The real tell for McCain&#039;s threat to the Democrat bid is his popularity in states like Virginia and Oregon.

I&#039;ve gone into things a bit already &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.griffindor.org.uk/index.php?subaction=showfull&amp;id=1203974453&amp;archive=&amp;start_from=&amp;ucat=2,12,24,33,75,77,78,79&amp;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on here&lt;/a&gt;.

Of course it&#039;s far too early to tell really, but the key here is like you say, how many vote and how many independents go each way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I would take the latter half with a pinch of salt. Statistically McCain is less popular than Obama (who is on an upward trend in almost every poll) where it matters, the swing states. He is &#8220;competitive&#8221; in Ohio to the tune of being within or just around the margin of error. What&#8217;s important to remember here is the context. Ohio is a republican state after 2004, though obviously marginally. The real tell for McCain&#8217;s threat to the Democrat bid is his popularity in states like Virginia and Oregon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gone into things a bit already <a href="http://www.griffindor.org.uk/index.php?subaction=showfull&amp;id=1203974453&amp;archive=&amp;start_from=&amp;ucat=2,12,24,33,75,77,78,79&amp;" rel="nofollow">on here</a>.</p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;s far too early to tell really, but the key here is like you say, how many vote and how many independents go each way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

