<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kay Burley on Sky News—Incompetent, ignorant or just malicious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/</link>
	<description>creating a new liberal-left force</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:40:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-45794</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-45794</guid>
		<description>when will they sack kay burley shes just plain stupid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when will they sack kay burley shes just plain stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimjoe</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-43239</link>
		<dc:creator>jimjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-43239</guid>
		<description>i cant stand kay burley and all the skynews crew fukin dissinfo agents the whole lot of em</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i cant stand kay burley and all the skynews crew fukin dissinfo agents the whole lot of em</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-21765</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-21765</guid>
		<description>I am sick to death of Kay Burley. Her news broadcasting style is arrogant and self-righteous, and one sided. Do I want to hear how she loves Arsenal football club and that England will beat every other team on the planet - when they don&#039;t. She crosses the line in interviews, and not even in an informative way like Jeremy Paxman. Its all about her being more important than the story she is covering. SKY News has become the tabloid of TV news stations. BBC World, Al Jazeera and even CNN (did I say that?!) are actually a lot more informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sick to death of Kay Burley. Her news broadcasting style is arrogant and self-righteous, and one sided. Do I want to hear how she loves Arsenal football club and that England will beat every other team on the planet &#8211; when they don&#8217;t. She crosses the line in interviews, and not even in an informative way like Jeremy Paxman. Its all about her being more important than the story she is covering. SKY News has become the tabloid of TV news stations. BBC World, Al Jazeera and even CNN (did I say that?!) are actually a lot more informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6083</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6083</guid>
		<description>Sunny, thank you

* smooches *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny, thank you</p>
<p>* smooches *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike1thinks</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6050</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike1thinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6050</guid>
		<description>Good article Mat... I do not subscribe to Sky...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article Mat&#8230; I do not subscribe to Sky&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6024</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6024</guid>
		<description>Lee Griffin...I think there is a big difference between &#039;pointless and obvious&#039; and this question, which goes way beyond any conventions of taste and decency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Griffin&#8230;I think there is a big difference between &#8216;pointless and obvious&#8217; and this question, which goes way beyond any conventions of taste and decency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6019</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6019</guid>
		<description>By &quot;no end&quot; she means &quot;I mentioned it when she whinged at me for not telling her I&#039;d posted here&quot; but, y&#039;know.  Comment notification good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By &#8220;no end&#8221; she means &#8220;I mentioned it when she whinged at me for not telling her I&#8217;d posted here&#8221; but, y&#8217;know.  Comment notification good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny Hundal</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6014</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Hundal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6014</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Sunny, for pete’s sake sort out comment notification, will you?I’ve had to put up with no end of moaning about how nobody had commented on his post, until he realised that they had and he just wasn’t getting notified…&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t know whether to laugh at Mat moaning to you about that... or cry about the fact that I&#039;ve been bullied into following your command :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sunny, for pete’s sake sort out comment notification, will you?I’ve had to put up with no end of moaning about how nobody had commented on his post, until he realised that they had and he just wasn’t getting notified…</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know whether to laugh at Mat moaning to you about that&#8230; or cry about the fact that I&#8217;ve been bullied into following your command <img src='http://liberalconspiracy.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gracchi</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6013</link>
		<dc:creator>Gracchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6013</guid>
		<description>Great post Matt- welcome to the team!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Matt- welcome to the team!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdochisation - Chicken Yoghurt</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6012</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdochisation - Chicken Yoghurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6012</guid>
		<description>[...] Mat has more. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mat has more. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6011</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6011</guid>
		<description>Cloned poster, that would involve actually paying Sky and watching their content; that would take a braver person than I.

Mike, it makes a change from all the talk about what women want that goes on between men at this site.

Sunny, for pete&#039;s sake sort out comment notification, will you?I&#039;ve had to put up with no end of moaning about how nobody had commented on his post, until he realised that they had and he just wasn&#039;t getting notified...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cloned poster, that would involve actually paying Sky and watching their content; that would take a braver person than I.</p>
<p>Mike, it makes a change from all the talk about what women want that goes on between men at this site.</p>
<p>Sunny, for pete&#8217;s sake sort out comment notification, will you?I&#8217;ve had to put up with no end of moaning about how nobody had commented on his post, until he realised that they had and he just wasn&#8217;t getting notified&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Heath</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6007</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-6007</guid>
		<description>MatGB

Welcome to the team, dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MatGB</p>
<p>Welcome to the team, dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee &#187; Sky breaking news while it breaks the news</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5996</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee &#187; Sky breaking news while it breaks the news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5996</guid>
		<description>[...] News is also rightly being criticised today for a truly disgusting interview conducted by the diabolical Kay Burley. She was previously famous for her measured response on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News is also rightly being criticised today for a truly disgusting interview conducted by the diabolical Kay Burley. She was previously famous for her measured response on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloned Poster</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5993</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloned Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5993</guid>
		<description>Glad someone spoke out about this. This was on a feed-loop on Sky News last weekend. I think there is a glorious opportunity for a blogger with great talents to have a blog dedicated solely to the manure that Sky calls editorial &quot;comment&quot;. Step forward who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad someone spoke out about this. This was on a feed-loop on Sky News last weekend. I think there is a glorious opportunity for a blogger with great talents to have a blog dedicated solely to the manure that Sky calls editorial &#8220;comment&#8221;. Step forward who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Power</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5991</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5991</guid>
		<description>MatGB 

Gee, thanks for explaining things to me,  but I think even my feeble brain managed to grasp the point :)  

I just wanted to point out, given the questions being asked of men, that this conversation was actually between two women. I happen to think that is relevant when statements are then made, on the basis of what passed between them,  about what men want.  

It suggests that somehow, because this interviewer chose to ask a dumb question, there is some need for to respond to vague questions about smothering and mothering! 

Why make any assumptions at all about what men want  based on a stupid question put  by a not very bright interviewer to an even more gormless woman who, last time I looked, was going to stand by her disgusting, murderous partner  she thought was innocent anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MatGB </p>
<p>Gee, thanks for explaining things to me,  but I think even my feeble brain managed to grasp the point <img src='http://liberalconspiracy.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>I just wanted to point out, given the questions being asked of men, that this conversation was actually between two women. I happen to think that is relevant when statements are then made, on the basis of what passed between them,  about what men want.  </p>
<p>It suggests that somehow, because this interviewer chose to ask a dumb question, there is some need for to respond to vague questions about smothering and mothering! </p>
<p>Why make any assumptions at all about what men want  based on a stupid question put  by a not very bright interviewer to an even more gormless woman who, last time I looked, was going to stand by her disgusting, murderous partner  she thought was innocent anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobbywatcher</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5989</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobbywatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5989</guid>
		<description>Perhaps someone should ask to Kay Burley:  Do you think if George Pascoe Watson had had a better sex life, he would have left Alison Hardie for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps someone should ask to Kay Burley:  Do you think if George Pascoe Watson had had a better sex life, he would have left Alison Hardie for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5988</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5988</guid>
		<description>Pete&#039;s point is a strong one, Sky is entertainment pretending to be news—the problem being that a lot of people do take it seriously as a news broadcaster and it asks to be taken seriously.

@ Mike: The point isn&#039;t that it was two women interviewing, it was that the question implies men should be absolved of responsibility for their actions, it&#039;s always the women at fault: lack of sex at home? that&#039;s an excuse for murder.  Girl in revealingly short skirt?  That&#039;s an excuse for rape.  Neither should be acceptable, but both are used, the latter both in rape trials and in religious texts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete&#8217;s point is a strong one, Sky is entertainment pretending to be news—the problem being that a lot of people do take it seriously as a news broadcaster and it asks to be taken seriously.</p>
<p>@ Mike: The point isn&#8217;t that it was two women interviewing, it was that the question implies men should be absolved of responsibility for their actions, it&#8217;s always the women at fault: lack of sex at home? that&#8217;s an excuse for murder.  Girl in revealingly short skirt?  That&#8217;s an excuse for rape.  Neither should be acceptable, but both are used, the latter both in rape trials and in religious texts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Fenelon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5987</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Fenelon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5987</guid>
		<description>What are Sky&#039;s public service broadcasting commitments? Exactly. Their &#039;news&#039; is entertainment, aimed firmly at the lower-end tabloid readers. Rigorous analysis and reasoned debate is not something one would expect on that platform; the news agenda is tailored to the other inputs the viewers are receiving (reactionary, right-wing, resolutely populist, no complexities, pro law-and-order) and Burley is acting as an audience mouthpiece here.

Burley&#039;s journalistic experience is long past - she&#039;s spent most of her career as a talking head on downmarket channels. The fault is as much an editorial one as a presnetational one, but making Murdoch&#039;s empire take news seriously? No chance.

It&#039;s a closed loop - Sky News viewers get the news they want. Or deserve....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are Sky&#8217;s public service broadcasting commitments? Exactly. Their &#8216;news&#8217; is entertainment, aimed firmly at the lower-end tabloid readers. Rigorous analysis and reasoned debate is not something one would expect on that platform; the news agenda is tailored to the other inputs the viewers are receiving (reactionary, right-wing, resolutely populist, no complexities, pro law-and-order) and Burley is acting as an audience mouthpiece here.</p>
<p>Burley&#8217;s journalistic experience is long past &#8211; she&#8217;s spent most of her career as a talking head on downmarket channels. The fault is as much an editorial one as a presnetational one, but making Murdoch&#8217;s empire take news seriously? No chance.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a closed loop &#8211; Sky News viewers get the news they want. Or deserve&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ministry of Truth</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5986</link>
		<dc:creator>Ministry of Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5986</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The World&#8217;s Worst Round - Kay Burley Edition...&lt;/strong&gt;

If, like me, you&#8217;re a bit of an aficionado of improvised comedy shows like the classic &#8216;Who&#8217;s Line is it Anyway&#8217; or &#8216;Mock The Week&#8217; then you&#8217;ll know that one of the staples of such shows is the &#8216;World&amp;#82...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The World&#8217;s Worst Round &#8211; Kay Burley Edition&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>If, like me, you&#8217;re a bit of an aficionado of improvised comedy shows like the classic &#8216;Who&#8217;s Line is it Anyway&#8217; or &#8216;Mock The Week&#8217; then you&#8217;ll know that one of the staples of such shows is the &#8216;World&amp;#82&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Griffin</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5985</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5985</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s no worse a question than the media asks on a range of other subjects. All the major broadcasters do it and I have lost count of the amount of times I&#039;ve turned the news off exasperated because I can&#039;t believe people are paid for asking so many pointless or obvious questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s no worse a question than the media asks on a range of other subjects. All the major broadcasters do it and I have lost count of the amount of times I&#8217;ve turned the news off exasperated because I can&#8217;t believe people are paid for asking so many pointless or obvious questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publicansdecoy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator>Publicansdecoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5984</guid>
		<description>&quot;Six months! To raise money for a jam festival? Isn&#039;t that rather stupid?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Six months! To raise money for a jam festival? Isn&#8217;t that rather stupid?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Power</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5983</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5983</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Don’t men want to be grown ups? Do they actually want to be mothered and smothered into irrelevancy?&lt;/i&gt;

Unless I missed something wasn&#039;t the interview conducted between two females?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Don’t men want to be grown ups? Do they actually want to be mothered and smothered into irrelevancy?</i></p>
<p>Unless I missed something wasn&#8217;t the interview conducted between two females?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve B, UK</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5982</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve B, UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5982</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just an absolutely disgusting question, and I&#039;m wondering what would have happened if it had been a male journalist asking it. 

What substance was there to the question? The idea that men who don&#039;t get enough may decide to murder girls instead? How is any reponse more than speculation anyway, and how the hell is this informing anyone?

It&#039;s the absolute definition of empty sensationalism. Come back real investigative journalists, all is forgiven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just an absolutely disgusting question, and I&#8217;m wondering what would have happened if it had been a male journalist asking it. </p>
<p>What substance was there to the question? The idea that men who don&#8217;t get enough may decide to murder girls instead? How is any reponse more than speculation anyway, and how the hell is this informing anyone?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the absolute definition of empty sensationalism. Come back real investigative journalists, all is forgiven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Power</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5981</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5981</guid>
		<description>Was there even a need to interview this woman at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there even a need to interview this woman at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny Hundal</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5980</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Hundal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/02/28/kay-burley-pamela-wright-interview/#comment-5980</guid>
		<description>Jesus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
