The government will try and push its Counter Terrorism Bill through parliament in the next few weeks. This bill includes the provision to hold someone in detention, without charging them, for 42 days – a two week increase on the current limit of 28 days. Unsurprisingly, New Labour has been trying to paint this extension of police powers in benign terms. But we should not be fooled. Why? Because:
Despite vague allusions to ‘emergencies,’ the reality of the new proposals is that the Home Secretary can activate these powers at any time. There is no need for a public emergency of the type often drawn upon by government ministers; the ‘nightmare scenario’ of police overwhelmed by multiple terror plots. Indeed, an individual case can be trigger enough. Parliamentary safeguards proposed are anything but. The Home Secretary only has to inform Parliament that she has triggered the 42-day limit. Parliament will only be allowed to a vote up to 30 days later and then only if the government is seeking to renew the powers for another 30 days – by which time suspects could have already been held for six weeks. Further, even if used unlawfully, the decision to trigger the 42-day limit cannot be challenged and the power could not be struck down.
We have to try and oppose this draconian piece of legislation by:
1) Raising awareness that the vote is coming to parliament soon
2) Encouraging people to write to their MPs opposing this bill.
3) Informing of events, protests or publicity stunts on the issue.
4) Generate and share ideas on what we can do.
So far, we have: a Facebook group designed to raise awareness; a Downing St. petition against it; a basic list of public figures opposing it. Clearly, this is not enough.
The problem is that the home secretary has been doing a lot of arm-twisting over the past few weeks and there’s a threat going around to Labour MPs who dare to help the government lose its first big vote. I have a bad feeling this will go through.
If we are serious about opposing this latest attack on our civil liberties, we have to do more. So, here goes:
1) We are going to blog this issue regularly (from now until the vote) along with OurKingdom. Please join our campaign by doing the same!
2) Compass is asking for submissions to a consultation. Add your views (until 15th).
3) I’ll soon publish a list of MPs who opposed the 90 days extention. It’s best we put pressure on them specifically.
4) Ideas or suggestions for a publicity stunt later this month welcome!
5) An event is planned later this month at City Circle. Will let you know more soon.
| Post to del.icio.us |
[...] is supporting Liberal Conspiracy’s campaign against 42 days detention, and will be blogging [...]
[...] Posted on 15 February 08, 4:00 pm by ourkingdom OurKingdom is supporting Liberal Conspiracy’s campaign against 42 days detention, and will be publishing a series of posts about it over the next few [...]
[...] day detention February 15, 2008 The Liberal Conspiracy campaign and list of MPs who abstained or voted against 90 [...]
[...] Posted on 21 February 08, 11:00 am by ourkingdom OurKingdom is supporting Liberal Conspiracy’s campaign against 42 days detention, and will be publishing a series of posts about it over the next few [...]
[...] Posted on 26 February 08, 10:42 am by ourkingdom OurKingdom is supporting Liberal Conspiracy’s campaign against 42 days detention, and will be publishing a series of posts about it over the next few [...]
[...] 08, 3:28 pm by ourkingdom Anthony Barnett (London, OK): While Sunny Hundal tries to gather everyone (including a 5,000 facebook users) around ‘Not a day Longer’ and Shami [...]
[...] Anthony Barnett at OurKingdom: Anthony Barnett (London, OK): While Sunny Hundal tries to gather everyone (including a 5,000 facebook users) around ‘Not a day Longer’ and Shami Chakrabarti’s [...]
Good luck.
I still find Jacqui Smith’s responses to this hilarious. At no time has anyone been able to come up with any reason why we need this extension, let alone one good enough to justify such an obscene idea.
If she could list the senior figures who want it, could put forward a case as to how it would have made any difference in the past… anything. But she’s got absolutely nothing, and doesn’t even try.
It must be stopped. The public is overwhelmingly against it, and now that ID cards look to be nicely buried, this is the biggest piece of civil-liberty-eroding legislation coming up.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
| 8 Comments 11 Comments 14 Comments 9 Comments 24 Comments 49 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 47 Comments 9 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » Liberal Conspiracy » Data abuse posted on Fabians fail the Fairness Test » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » Rob posted on A Song for Cameron » SimonG posted on DNA Sampling: Wrong in principle, wrong in practice » John Q. Publican posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » SimonG posted on Choose your scumbag of the week » zooey posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society' » Unity posted on A Song for Cameron » Dunc posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Larry Teabag posted on A Song for Cameron » Dan | thesamovar posted on What brain scans can't teach us » John Q. Publican posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Golden Gordon posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society' » John Q. Publican posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Watchman posted on Tory grassroots split over North Korea Last 50 // Comments feed |