Comments on: A lie told often enough… http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/ Left-wing news, opinion and activism Tue, 22 May 2012 13:20:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Pam Zavala http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-84722 Pam Zavala Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:41:25 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-84722 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Liberal Conspiracy » A lie told often enough… http://tinyurl.com/ydltewu</span></span> Liberal Conspiracy » A lie told often enough… http://tinyurl.com/ydltewu

]]> By: sanbikinoraion http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4438 sanbikinoraion Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:57:58 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4438 Can I recommend an alternative to disemvowelling? Just make their text appear paler and smaller than everyone else's - much harder to read, but the full text is there for anyone who cares to read it. Can I recommend an alternative to disemvowelling?

Just make their text appear paler and smaller than everyone else’s – much harder to read, but the full text is there for anyone who cares to read it.

]]> By: Jennie http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4402 Jennie Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:26:45 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4402 Bah! I wanted to read the illiterate abusive dribblings! Bah! I wanted to read the illiterate abusive dribblings!

]]> By: David Boothroyd http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4398 David Boothroyd Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:29:51 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4398 You mean 'disemvowelled'. You mean ‘disemvowelled’.

]]> By: Sunny Hundal http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4386 Sunny Hundal Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:02:57 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4386 I love it when Nadine Dorries gets comprehensively demolished in her defense of this debate. It really is amusing how much obfuscation the right try and do over this. Apparently, they use reasoning and intelligence in their arguments you know. This should make a great battle. Nice work Unity. Newmania's post, which didn't make sense other than contain abuse, has been de-vowelised. I love it when Nadine Dorries gets comprehensively demolished in her defense of this debate. It really is amusing how much obfuscation the right try and do over this. Apparently, they use reasoning and intelligence in their arguments you know.

This should make a great battle. Nice work Unity.

Newmania’s post, which didn’t make sense other than contain abuse, has been de-vowelised.

]]> By: newmania http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4384 newmania Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:05:02 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4384 [troll] Yes well seeking to understand is how you lot tried to cope with illiteracy wasn’t it and forgot to tell anyone to shut up and get with their lessons . Seeking to understand is how you deal with the Islamic threat and seeking to understand is the way you would deal with an invading army or a snake . You would seek to understand it to death. It s all such a conceited and worthless lot of foppish cant , you see girls flushing babies down the toilet and you seek to understand it . That is priority Z but thanks for your input . In any case you do not you are trying to rig the game and set rules that suit you. This I find to be true in various ways and always crops up when the weakly incestuous realtuionship between leftism and science is wheeled out . The tactic is this . I have a view . If I say that I have a view then it will be subjective and discounted . I therefore will take some of my constituency accord them respect and ask them the opinion of my view . Then my view is the truth. Jesus Brown is the world champion closely followed by Toynbee .The environmentalists are possibly the most clownishly risible offenders . Why would you do it irf you didn’t believe it ? Who pays you to do it ...well anyway I digress. If at some point a soul come into the world then at that point to dispose of it is manslaughter at best . Erring on the side of safety doesn’t sound so unreasonable does it and if viability is the rule then the weapons will be this or that scientists. Scientists say what pays them ,either by grant or by the cohering instinct of their class, the Liberal left. Maverick scientists will not proceed as well they will be excluded and they will find it difficult to make their careers . Surprisingly often they are right though. Immigration for example . Your opinions in this matter are of no special value . You have a point of view you are just to scared to come out and say what it is , you would rather hide behind a welter of self referential nonsense so you cannot be spotted. This subject is about moral and ethical views allied to political constituencies and scientists just do as they are told what does science have to say about the soul . By Answer me this , how many highly regarded writers on Women’s Studies would agree with the statement that the wage rewards to men and women broadly reflect their relative input . None and yet this is perfectly arguable view and probably true -ish . You see the problem ? Go to hell… . don’t do that you are crap at it Seriously [troll]
Yes well seeking to understand is how you lot tried to cope with illiteracy wasn’t it and forgot to tell anyone to shut up and get with their lessons . Seeking to understand is how you deal with the Islamic threat and seeking to understand is the way you would deal with an invading army or a snake . You would seek to understand it to death. It s all such a conceited and worthless lot of foppish cant , you see girls flushing babies down the toilet and you seek to understand it . That is priority Z but thanks for your input . In any case you do not you are trying to rig the game and set rules that suit you. This I find to be true in various ways and always crops up when the weakly incestuous realtuionship between leftism and science is wheeled out .
The tactic is this . I have a view . If I say that I have a view then it will be subjective and discounted . I therefore will take some of my constituency accord them respect and ask them the opinion of my view . Then my view is the truth. Jesus Brown is the world champion closely followed by Toynbee .The environmentalists are possibly the most clownishly risible offenders . Why would you do it irf you didn’t believe it ? Who pays you to do it …well anyway I digress.
If at some point a soul come into the world then at that point to dispose of it is manslaughter at best . Erring on the side of safety doesn’t sound so unreasonable does it and if viability is the rule then the weapons will be this or that scientists. Scientists say what pays them ,either by grant or by the cohering instinct of their class, the Liberal left. Maverick scientists will not proceed as well they will be excluded and they will find it difficult to make their careers . Surprisingly often they are right though. Immigration for example . Your opinions in this matter are of no special value . You have a point of view you are just to scared to come out and say what it is , you would rather hide behind a welter of self referential nonsense so you cannot be spotted.
This subject is about moral and ethical views allied to political constituencies and scientists just do as they are told what does science have to say about the soul . By Answer me this , how many highly regarded writers on Women’s Studies would agree with the statement that the wage rewards to men and women broadly reflect their relative input . None and yet this is perfectly arguable view and probably true -ish . You see the problem ?

Go to hell… . don’t do that you are crap at it Seriously

]]> By: Kate Belgrave http://liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4381 Kate Belgrave Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:41:40 +0000 http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2008/01/28/a-lie-told-often-enough/#comment-4381 Hope the great Nads realises that fellow of her arch-Conservatives are busy on the circuit, proclaiming that abortion law should be modernised so that women don't require two signatures from doctors to get an abortion, and that nurses can perform abortions, etc. I give you one John Bercow by way of example - the once-legendary ultra-reactionary who is now doing the rounds as Mr Pro-Choice. I'm also still waiting to hear what the likes of Nads plans to do by way of financial support for women whom she'd like to force to see pregnancy to term. Maybe they could ebay their 4D images. Cool. Hope the great Nads realises that fellow of her arch-Conservatives are busy on the circuit, proclaiming that abortion law should be modernised so that women don’t require two signatures from doctors to get an abortion, and that nurses can perform abortions, etc.

I give you one John Bercow by way of example – the once-legendary ultra-reactionary who is now doing the rounds as Mr Pro-Choice.

I’m also still waiting to hear what the likes of Nads plans to do by way of financial support for women whom she’d like to force to see pregnancy to term. Maybe they could ebay their 4D images.

Cool.

]]>