Against ContactPoint: Latest


by Dave Hill    
December 5, 2007 at 2:40 pm

The 10 Downing Street petition against the planned database on children – which I wrote about here on Monday – now has over 1,000 names. It’s open until 20th December. Sign now and while you’re in fighting mood urge your MP to sign the Early Day Motion of Annette Brooke MP, Lib Dem spokesperson on children, asking the government to “reconsider its decision to proceed” with the scheme. You could raise the matter with your local schoolteachers too.

I’ve had an indication that the government may be adjusting its defence of ContactPoint. A correspondent tells me of a colleague who wrote to Ed Balls mentioning the invoking by ministers of the Victoria Climbie case as the primary reason for the database being set up. Beverley Hughes has been especially quick to do this as a way of countering critics. I’m told Balls’s reply included the following;

“In your letter, you assert the Government is introducing ContactPoint chiefly to prevent another terrible case like that of Victoria Climbie. This is not the case. The chief purpose of ContactPoint is to improve the efficiency of children’s services by freeing up practitioner time.”

My correspondent remarks that offering bureaucratic convenience as justification for reducing family privacy is unacceptable. Agreed. The same source also remarks:

“The government comments fail to mention that if you want to know a child’s GP school, etc YOU CAN ASK THE CHILD OR PARENT. They keep talking as if there were no other route than IT. It’s worth reminding people that the old fashioned low-tech solution of being polite and asking is still a viable option. Some LAs [local authorities] report [during pilot schemes] that users don’t know who they are in contact with. We should not ask families to give up privacy to compensate for incompetent professional practice.”

Agreed again. ContactPoint is a dud. And I haven’t even mentioned E-Caf yet.
Campaign page

                Post to del.icio.us

· About the author: Dave Hill is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is a novelist, blogger, journalist, married resident of Hackney in east London and father of six children. His novels are about family life. Most of his journalism is for the Guardian and may be about anything from politics to sport to domestic appliances. His Big Britain blog carries a mixture of commentary, photographs and links to local blogs all over the UK. His own local blog called Clapton Pond documents the life and times of the enthralling, sometimes appalling, often inspiring piece of Britain where he lives. London Mayor & More is tracking the mayorality campaign. Also at: Comment is free, Big Britain, London Mayor & More and Clapton Pond

· Other posts by Dave Hill

· Filed under: Blog , Campaigns , Civil liberties , ContactPoint

· About this article: This post is part of a campaign on LC


6 Comments in response   ||  



Reactions: Twitter, blogs


Reader comments

What’s so astonishing about Ed Balls’ reply is that those of us in ARCH, and my co-authors of the FIPR report to the Information Commissioner, have endured four years of bile and ad hominem attacks for daring to say that this whole database agenda was launched via a despicable piece of shroud-waving. The spin has been so effective that even now people still believe that Contactpoint/eCAF is something to do with child protection.

So, just for the record: no, it has nothing to do with Victoria Climbie, the plans were under discussion long before the Laming report into Victoria’s death, and although the government uses the phrase ‘at risk’ to describe the children whom they maintain will benefit from Contactpoint and eCAF, they do not mean ‘at risk of significant harm’ (the generally understood meaning).

The phrase has been quietly hijacked and redefined as ‘at risk of social exclusion’. The government estimates that this covers up to 50% of children, who will need extra services in order to meet the ‘five outcomes’ set out in the government’s original ‘Every Child Matters’ green paper.

Consider the petition signed.

Thanks for writing about this, Dave. I signed the petition yesterday.

I’ll try and write to Diane Abbott tomorrow.

I will definitely write about this. The amount of misleading of the public by the Government regarding the purpose of this piece of data centralisation (and also the NHS Spine which I consider to be the other side of the same coin) has been immense.

The HMRC fiasco has clearly taught them nothing.

Have signed it too.

Thanks for those supportive and informative comments. Terri is a signatory to letter about ContactPoint in today’s Guardian…

http://www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,,2222595,00.html

…and the ARCH blog she maintains is a mine of valuable information about ContactPoint, E-Caf and related issues.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or rss feeds.
Recent articles across Liberal Conspiracy
LibCon news

8 Comments 18 Comments 15 Comments 20 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 57 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 49 Comments

click here!



LATEST COMMENTS
» crusade posted on Against multiculturalism

» 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism

» 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism

» ukliberty posted on Vote Pirate Party

» ukliberty posted on Vote Pirate Party

» Thebee posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society'

» Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism

» Just Visiting posted on Against multiculturalism

» Matt Munro posted on Vote Pirate Party

» Thebee posted on Tories offer state funding to schools linked to 'occult society'

» Daniel Hoffmann-Gill posted on Contra Stimulus!

» Friend posted on Dizzy in a tizzy over MP's invoice

» 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism

» Lee Griffin posted on Against multiculturalism

» Lee Griffin posted on Against multiculturalism

  Last 50 // Comments feed