Iran not making nukes shock
The Guardian today leads with the story that a US National Intelligence Estimate, which pulls together the work of the 16 American intelligence agencies, concluded: “We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003 Tehran halted its nuclear weapons programme.” Whoops. What are the neo-conservatives going to do now? The article goes on to say:
In a startling admission from an administration that regularly portrays Iran as the biggest threat to the Middle East and the world, the NIE said: “We do not know whether [Iran] currently intends to develop nuclear weapons.” That contradicts the assessment two years ago that baldly stated that Tehran was “determined to develop nuclear weapons”.
…
Although a halt to the nuclear weapons programme is significant, the NIE is far from a clean bill of health for Iran. Tehran is pushing ahead with its uranium enrichment programme, which has only limited civilian use and could be quickly converted to nuclear military use. The NIE warned that Iran could secure a nuclear weapon by 2010. The US state department’s intelligence and research office, one of the agencies involved, said the more likely timescale would be 2013. All the agencies concede that Iran may not have enough enriched uranium until after 2015.
Which, in my view, indicates that while diplomatic pressure must remain on the country to avoid building nukes, there is no viable reason to go to war with the country to protect Israeli sovereignty anytime soon. In case that wasn’t already obvious.
The decision to publish the NIE is aimed at trying to recover the public credibility lost when the agencies wrongly claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in the years leading up to 2003.
No shit sherlock.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Story Filed Under: Blog ,Foreign affairs ,Middle East
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
All seems quite reasonable.
The report suggests that Iran is not as desperate to get nukes as some people pretend, and suggests likewise that America is not as desperate to invade iran as some people pretend.
No doubt the hint of military action will remain, since it would be hard to argue that Iran’s move away from developing nuclear weapons didn’t coincide somewhat with an increased threat of intervention.
But if we all get what we want without bloodshed thats a good thing.
Exploding heads in Tel Aviv.
“there is no viable reason to go to war with the country to protect Israeli sovereignty anytime soon. ”
Iran hasn’t been threatening Israel’s sovereignty (how could it?), it has been threatening its existence
The 2007 NIE does not eliminate Iran as a threat to mid-east peace. It eliminates them as a nuclear threat to mid-east peace and removes any case for military strikes against suspected nuclear facilities. The 2005 IC assessment was vague enough to allow folks to feel nervous about Iran’s intent and capability.
Iran is still a threat to peace in the region, mostly in Lebanon and between Israel and Palestinians.
However, this estimate brings a big sigh of relief to a lot of people, as I am sure you will agree.
Nicely put together blog, by the way!
JG
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Incidents like this shame us all
» Taxpayers Alliance want to cut taxes, mostly for the rich
» We’re turning The Spirit Level into a film: help us in that goal
» I love the counter-productive attitude of right-wing commentators
» Watch out for the TPA’s report arguing for more cuts tomorrow
» The resurgence of bigoted conservatism in Ireland
» What’s the point of being ‘British’?
» The tragedy behind the Sam Hallam case
» Will JP Morgan be able to walk away from billion dollar losses?
» Labour is now even more reliant on left-wing voters
» We need the minimum wage for under-21s to be raised
|
8 Comments 12 Comments 51 Comments 38 Comments 19 Comments 12 Comments 30 Comments 116 Comments 25 Comments 33 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » andrew adams posted on Taxpayers Alliance want to cut taxes, mostly for the rich » Barney posted on Five amusing bits from TPA report you likely missed » Freeman posted on Incidents like this shame us all » Chaise Guevara posted on Frank Field wrong on 'never worked' households » Chaise Guevara posted on Five amusing bits from TPA report you likely missed » Simon posted on Frank Field wrong on 'never worked' households » Sarah Brown posted on Incidents like this shame us all » Valerie Chambers posted on Five amusing bits from TPA report you likely missed » Jerry Chambers posted on Five amusing bits from TPA report you likely missed » Tyler posted on Britons: banks not paying fair share for crisis » Shatterface posted on Incidents like this shame us all » leftlinks posted on Five amusing bits from TPA report you likely missed » ex-Labour voter posted on Frank Field wrong on 'never worked' households » Five amusing bits from TPA report you likely missed | Liberal Conspiracy posted on TPA report quotes Bible to preach low taxation » Shrugged... posted on Britons: banks not paying fair share for crisis |










